CASE STUDY 02/ COLLECTIBLES MARKETPLACE

CASE STUDY 02/ COLLECTIBLES MARKETPLACE

Collectivault

Collectors buy for the story behind an item: who wore it, and what it meant to them. But in more than forty interviews, they told us they will not spend their money without proof it is real. So I designed a marketplace that shows the proof at every step, and gives ordinary fans a fair way in.

Collectors buy for the story behind an item: who wore it, and what it meant to them. But in more than forty interviews, they told us they will not spend their money without proof it is real. So I designed a marketplace that shows the proof at every step, and gives ordinary fans a fair way in.

Collectivault on a desktop monitor: the checkout for a Lewis Hamilton helmet from Fuji 2007, with delivery details and a Place Your Bid button
Collectivault on a desktop monitor: the checkout for a Lewis Hamilton helmet from Fuji 2007, with delivery details and a Place Your Bid button

ROLE

Product Designer

TEAM

Capstone team of five, then solo

TIMELINE

Late 2025, then Mar to Aug 2026

SKILLS

User research, User flows, Wireframing, Design system

ROLE

Product Designer

TEAM

Capstone team of five, then solo

TIMELINE

Late 2025, then Mar to Aug 2026

SKILLS

User research, User flows, Wireframing, Design system

ROLE

Product Designer

TEAM

Capstone team of five, then solo

TIMELINE

Late 2025, then Mar to Aug 2026

SKILLS

User research, User flows, Wireframing, Design system

40+

Fans, collectors, and investing experts interviewed on why they buy

40+

Fans, collectors, and investing experts interviewed on why they buy

40+

Fans, collectors, and investing experts interviewed on why they buy

9

User flows ready for developers to build

9

User flows ready for developers to build

9

User flows ready for developers to build

6

Sprints to deliver them, with a full design system

6

Sprints to deliver them, with a full design system

6

Sprints to deliver them, with a full design system

SELECTED SCREENS

SELECTED SCREENS

Collectivault logo
Collectivault logo
Collectivault exclusive drop screen
Collectivault exclusive drop screen
Collectivault logo mark
Collectivault brand colour palette
Collectivault logo mark
Collectivault brand colour palette
Collectivault competitive positioning
Collectivault competitive positioning
Collectivault onboarding screens
Collectivault onboarding screens
Collectivault card design
Collectivault card design
Collectivault fractional shares screens
Collectivault fractional shares screens
Collectivault vault screen
Collectivault vault screen
Slides from the Collectivault presentation deck
Slides from the Collectivault presentation deck

THE PROBLEM

THE PROBLEM

Sports memorabilia is sold in two very different places. Auction houses serve investors and can feel closed to everyone else, while open marketplaces are flooded with fakes.

I led the capstone research: more than forty interviews, with everyone from die-hard fans to investing experts. They told us they buy for sentiment and connection, but will not spend their money without proof an item is real. So the task was a marketplace that feels personal and earns trust at the same time.

Three motivations came out of the research, which my team and I turned into three pillars: trust, access, and connection. After that, every feature had to serve at least one of the three.

Trust

Every item is verified by a third party and its provenance published, so the proof never comes from the seller.

Access

Fractional ownership lets someone own part of a high-value item within their means, so investors stop being the only people who can buy. Popcorn bidding does the same job at the other end: it extends the clock by 30 minutes when a late bid lands, so a wealthy sniper cannot take the last second from an ordinary fan.

Connection

The 4-Day Exclusive Drop reveals an item through daily clues before bidding opens, which turns a transaction into a story.

Sports memorabilia is sold in two very different places. Auction houses serve investors and can feel closed to everyone else, while open marketplaces are flooded with fakes.

I led the capstone research: more than forty interviews, with everyone from die-hard fans to investing experts. They told us they buy for sentiment and connection, but will not spend their money without proof an item is real. So the task was a marketplace that feels personal and earns trust at the same time.

Three motivations came out of the research, which my team and I turned into three pillars: trust, access, and connection. After that, every feature had to serve at least one of the three.

Trust

Every item is verified by a third party and its provenance published, so the proof never comes from the seller.

Access

Fractional ownership lets someone own part of a high-value item within their means, so investors stop being the only people who can buy. Popcorn bidding does the same job at the other end: it extends the clock by 30 minutes when a late bid lands, so a wealthy sniper cannot take the last second from an ordinary fan.

Connection

The 4-Day Exclusive Drop reveals an item through daily clues before bidding opens, which turns a transaction into a story.

Watch the walkthrough: I narrate one drop from start to finish, through the Watch List, four days of clues, the three-step profile, and popcorn bidding.

Watch the walkthrough: I narrate one drop from start to finish, through the Watch List, four days of clues, the three-step profile, and popcorn bidding.

The onboarding trade-off

The original brief asked every new member for a lot of information before they could join an Exclusive Drop. My instinct was to push back, because every compulsory question is a reason to leave. But the founders had good reasons: regulation, and wanting to understand who their collectors were. It was a real tension between making it easy to join and knowing your customer.

“The client needed the data. I cut the list to ten questions, split them into three short steps you can complete in any order, and left people free to enjoy the drop itself until the moment they choose to bid.”

You can browse, follow a drop, and join the Watch List freely. You only need to complete the three steps when you decide to bid, and the interface tells you so at that moment, not on the way in. Someone seconds from bidding on the gloves they watched their father cheer for will finish ten questions without hesitation. Someone who is just curious is never asked to. The friction is still there, because the business needs it, but it now falls on the fans ready to invest, not on everyone who walks through the door.

The onboarding trade-off

The original brief asked every new member for a lot of information before they could join an Exclusive Drop. My instinct was to push back, because every compulsory question is a reason to leave. But the founders had good reasons: regulation, and wanting to understand who their collectors were. It was a real tension between making it easy to join and knowing your customer.

“The client needed the data. I cut the list to ten questions, split them into three short steps you can complete in any order, and left people free to enjoy the drop itself until the moment they choose to bid.”

You can browse, follow a drop, and join the Watch List freely. You only need to complete the three steps when you decide to bid, and the interface tells you so at that moment, not on the way in. Someone seconds from bidding on the gloves they watched their father cheer for will finish ten questions without hesitation. Someone who is just curious is never asked to. The friction is still there, because the business needs it, but it now falls on the fans ready to invest, not on everyone who walks through the door.

THE ALTERNATIVE I REJECTED

THE ALTERNATIVE I REJECTED

Collectivault onboarding: the rejected long form beside the chosen three short steps
Collectivault onboarding: the rejected long form beside the chosen three short steps

Rejected: one long form, up front

The same data collected, without asking for it at the door.

Chosen: three steps, bid-gated

Rejected: one long form, up front

The same data collected, without asking for it at the door.

Chosen: three steps, bid-gated

CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

What I learned

I was sure the choice was to push back or to do as I was asked. It was neither. The answer was to move the friction to the moment people most want to go through with it. Now I look for that middle way before I argue for either side. I also learned to decide how to measure a flow while I design it. I made a confident case for the three-step gate, but never said what would show it was working. A decision nobody can check is only an opinion with a wireframe attached.

Next steps

Moving the questions to the moment of bidding makes sense in principle, but it has not been measured yet, because my contract ended at handover. My advice to the developers was to test it with real users before launch, and to track three things: how many people complete each step, how many go on to bid, and where in the three steps people stop.

What I learned

I was sure the choice was to push back or to do as I was asked. It was neither. The answer was to move the friction to the moment people most want to go through with it. Now I look for that middle way before I argue for either side. I also learned to decide how to measure a flow while I design it. I made a confident case for the three-step gate, but never said what would show it was working. A decision nobody can check is only an opinion with a wireframe attached.

Next steps

Moving the questions to the moment of bidding makes sense in principle, but it has not been measured yet, because my contract ended at handover. My advice to the developers was to test it with real users before launch, and to track three things: how many people complete each step, how many go on to bid, and where in the three steps people stop.

© 2026 David Esteban. All rights reserved.

Designed and built in Framer

© 2026 David Esteban. All rights reserved.

Designed and built in Framer

© 2026 David Esteban. All rights reserved.

Designed and built in Framer